Margaret Kolb is a director in the Litigation, Forensic & Valuation Services Group at Anchin. She provides litigation consulting and forensic accounting services for civil and criminal cases dealing directly with law firms, in-house counsel and government agencies.
Margaret has provided litigation consulting and forensic investigation services for cases involving individuals, small and large companies, and not-for-profit organizations with emphasis on the evaluation of damages due to breach of contract or fiduciary duty, partnership and shareholder disputes, post-acquisition claims, fraud and financial reporting. Margaret has participated in numerous arbitrations, some involving damages in the hundreds of millions of dollars.
Margaret has executed numerous forensic investigations for not-for-profit clients. In connection with these investigations, she has worked directly with members of the New York State Attorney General’s Charities Bureau. In addition, Margaret has qualified as an expert in both state and federal litigation.
Her experience also includes providing audit and tax services to small and mid-sized privately held and publicly traded companies in the manufacturing, distribution and service industries.
Margaret received her B.B.A. in Public Accounting from Pace University. She is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants (NYSSCPA) and the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE).
- Litigation, Forensic and Valuation
- Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award DismissedMarch 16, 2017
Members of Anchin, Block & Anchin’s Litigation, Forensic and Valuation Services Group often serve as arbitrators. Alternative dispute resolution is an increasingly popular alternative to traditional litigation. Although the courts may be asked to review the validity an arbitrator’s award, unless there are unusual and extenuating circumstance, they will rarely overturn such awards.
- Conflicting Expert Opinions Preclude Summary Judgment DismissalMarch 7, 2017
Frequently, as part of our litigation, forensic and valuation services practice, we are called upon to issue expert reports. As can be imagined, it is common that the opinions expressed in the expert reports for each side are very different (reasonable professionals can disagree, right?). However, it is interesting to consider how much of an impact those different opinions can have on the case process.
- Defendant’s Participation in Litigation Waives Right to Compel ArbitrationFebruary 16, 2017
In our litigation, forensic and valuation services practice, we are often involved in cases where there is a question of whether or not an arbitration provision in an agreement can be enforced.
- Arbitration Panel’s Award Determined to be a Reasoned AwardFebruary 8, 2017
When a member of Anchin, Block & Anchin’s Litigation, Forensic and Valuation Services Group serves as an arbitrator, one of the things he or she needs to consider is whether his or her decision should be contained in a simple award or in a reasoned award; if the latter, how much detail needs to be included in the reasoned award.
- Prejudgment Interest Computed from Date of Damages Verdict, Not From Date of Liability StipulationJanuary 3, 2017
The litigation consultants and forensic accountants in Anchin’s Litigation, Forensic and Valuation Services Group are often confronted with the calculation of prejudgment interest. When dealing with the issue of prejudgment interest, a critical question that must be answered is from what date is the prejudgment interest computed.